We all have heard of the chicken and egg problems, where its hard to interpret which one came first, since one leads to the other. The same debate can be made about science and technology. Both are interdependent on each other and always a development in one lead to developments in other, although may or may not be directly linkable.We know that science is the study of nature and phenomenon as they are and how they happen using available tools and technology - a more qualitative approach. Technology on the other hand applies this science to solve some problem or create tools to control phenomenon for application - a quantitative approach.
So scientist use tools (technology) to learn about phenomenon and engineers develops tools by controlling specific studied and controllable phenomenon (science). It is more cross linked than cyclic.
..............-> New Science -> New Technology -> New Science -> New Technology ->............
It is not even this linear. There will probably be multiple 3D layers and with links in all directions.
Where does this begin and where will it end.. ;)
So scientist use tools (technology) to learn about phenomenon and engineers develops tools by controlling specific studied and controllable phenomenon (science). It is more cross linked than cyclic.
..............-> New Science -> New Technology -> New Science -> New Technology ->............
It is not even this linear. There will probably be multiple 3D layers and with links in all directions.
Where does this begin and where will it end.. ;)